🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 695+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Vintage 925 Sterling Silver Ring

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.6 out of 5 (695 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$120​
$200
Sale
βœ“ at no charge shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Sterling Silver RingStamped 925

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift delivery
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage 925 Sterling Silver Ring

Sterling Silver Ring

Stamped 925

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 867188

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Cuff Links

Original Price:$200 USD

Sale Price: $120 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ no-cost fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3992 reviews
NP​
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
flawless Vintage 925 Sterling Silver Ring
This is my third Vintage 925 Sterling Silver Ring purchase. Consistently solid every time.
44 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Cleveland, OH

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Really splendid
From my experience, the Vintage 925 Sterling Silver Ring performs as expected so no complaints.
20 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Outstanding!
Using the Vintage 925 Sterling Silver Ring daily right now. It’s holding up well.
26 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· San Antonio, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A must-have
After a few days, it works well enough so it’s acceptable.
27 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Worth every penny
At first, it does the job which feels reasonable. shipment was normal.
14 people found this helpful