🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 652+ reviews
Toys ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller

Vintage 1960’s wooden dominos

★★★★★ 4.9 out of 5 (652 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$11.37
$18.95
Sale
✓ at no charge shipment on this item • Limited time offer

Vintage 1960’s Wooden Dominos Tile Game, with animals and insects. Does not have box. Open to Offers.

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift delivery
↩️
effortless Returns

📋 Product Description

Vintage 1960’s wooden dominos

Vintage 1960’s Wooden Dominos Tile Game, with animals and insects. Does not have box. Open to Offers.

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 667005

Category: Toys > Building Toys > Stacking Blocks

Original Price: $18.95 USD

Sale Price: $11.37 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 dispatch & Returns

✓ no-cost fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 9791 reviews
DC
Daniel Clark ✓ Verified Purchase
5 months ago · Jacksonville, FL
★★★★☆
Couldn't be happier
To be fair, the Vintage 1960’s wooden dominos fits my needs which is good enough.
41 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris ✓ Verified Purchase
1 month ago · Columbus, OH
★★★★★
Outstanding!
Good materials and finish Vintage 1960’s wooden dominos.
36 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson
4 months ago · Pittsburgh, PA
★★★★★
splendid choice
the Vintage 1960’s wooden dominos is practical which is good enough. Packaging was easy.
26 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez ✓ Verified Purchase
7 months ago · Oakland, CA
★★★★☆
Simply fantastic
Personally, the Vintage 1960’s wooden dominos performs as expected and I’m satisfied. Nothing fancy.
16 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips ✓ Verified Purchase
11 months ago · Miami, FL
★★★★★
Absolutely fancy it
To be fair, the Vintage 1960’s wooden dominos does its job which is good enough.
29 people found this helpful