🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 223+ reviews
Women βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

WOMEN TIGHT SHAPER 50 - Tights

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.8 out of 5 (223 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$19.99
$33.32
Sale
βœ“ at no charge shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rise : HighPattern : PlainArticle number : C1181F030-C11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift delivery
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

WOMEN TIGHT SHAPER 50 - Tights

Rise : High
Pattern : Plain
Article number : C1181F030-C11

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 5466

Category: Women > Clothing > Socks & Tights

Original Price: $33.32 USD

Sale Price: $19.99 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ no-cost fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6997 reviews
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fantastic value for money
The WOMEN TIGHT SHAPER 50 - Tights arrived clean.​
50 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 weeks ago Β· Memphis, TN

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
adore love love!
The WOMEN TIGHT SHAPER 50 - Tights works smoothly and well.
17 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase​
7 months ago Β· Tampa, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
cherish this WOMEN TIGHT SHAPER 50 - Tights!
After a few use, the WOMEN TIGHT SHAPER 50 - Tights feels solid and it meets expectations. No setup issues.
3 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
faultless purchase
The WOMEN TIGHT SHAPER 50 - Tights fits well with my expectations.
8 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding!
At first, the WOMEN TIGHT SHAPER 50 - Tights works well enough and it’s fine overall.
5 people found this helpful